Google review management for a beauty salon
A beauty salon lives on its local reputation. Asterias follows your Google reviews live, writes an answer that picks up what the customer actually mentioned (the treatment given, the therapist named, how clean the room was), and leaves every decision below four stars to you.
Why it’s different for a beauty salon
A beauty salon works on skin, and that is what sets it apart from other service trades: a treatment that goes wrong is visible for days, and a share of the bad reviews are about a reaction rather than a result.
The four recurring complaints
A result below expectations
Patchy waxing, nails that do not last, a facial with no visible effect. The reply does not argue the protocol in public and never talks about the person’s skin. It acknowledges the disappointment, notes that a redo is covered within a set period where that is the case, and invites a call. Short.
Redness or a reaction after a treatment
The most delicate case. Describing a skin reaction in public, even reassuringly, says something medical about a named person. The reply invites them to call the salon without ever characterising what happened, and offers a check-up appointment. These reviews always come to you first.
A treatment cut short
An hour-long treatment that lasted forty minutes. A factual, checkable complaint, so it is not softened: the reply accepts it if it is accurate, says what the treatment actually includes, and corrects the service list if the advertised duration was wrong.
The atmosphere and privacy of the room
A door not quite closed, an overheard conversation, waiting-room music. Rarely the main cause, often the sentence that takes a review from four stars to two. A treatment that puts someone in a vulnerable position makes that detail enormous, and the reply treats it as such.
Two replies, in full
Waxing half done, I had to redo it at home the same evening. For 45 euros I expected something else.
Hello, and thank you for writing to us. Having to redo it yourself the same evening means the treatment was not delivered, and we take that seriously. All waxing is redone free of charge within seven days, that is a salon rule, and it should have been mentioned to you before you left. Call us on [phone] and we will find you a slot quickly, whatever the date of your appointment was.
It names a concrete rule, the seven-day redo, which also informs the next reader. And it argues neither the technique nor the person’s skin.
Very clean salon, quiet room, and Sarah really takes the time to explain what she is doing.
Thank you so much. Those three things are exactly the ones we care most about. We will pass it on to Sarah, who will be glad to read that the time spent explaining gets noticed. See you soon.
It picks up the three things named rather than thanking in general. Three lines are enough, and a longer answer to a five-star review shows.
When the reviews arrive
May and June concentrate the volume, with summer and wedding preparation: it is also the season of high-stakes requests and therefore of the sharpest reviews of the year.
December brings gift treatments and vouchers, with clients discovering the salon and comparing, and reviews more detailed than a regular’s.
January and September are the months of courses and packages, so reviews written after several sessions, better argued and more useful to read.
Every rating, its own treatment
4 and 5 stars
Answered automatically
A personal thank-you that picks up what the customer liked, published after a natural delay. Nothing for you to do.
3 stars
You approve
Asterias drafts an answer that acknowledges the problem and gives a reason to come back. It lands on WhatsApp or Telegram: one button to publish, one to rewrite.
1 and 2 stars
Nothing without you
Never published automatically by default. You get the review and a suggested reply. Send it, rewrite it, or let it go.
Common questions
A client describes a skin reaction in her review. Can you answer?
Yes, but without ever characterising what happened or mentioning her skin: that would be saying something medical about a named person, in public. The reply invites her to call the salon and offers a check-up. These reviews come to you before publication in every case.
Should a free redo be announced in the reply?
Restating a rule that already exists, yes: "all waxing is redone within seven days" informs everyone. Promising a case-by-case gesture in public, no: it attracts reviews written to obtain it.
A review criticises cleanliness. How do you answer without making it worse?
By acknowledging and saying what has been checked since, with not a word of explanation. In a salon, cleanliness is the one complaint that is never softened: a justification leaves the word attached to the business name.
Are reviews naming a therapist a problem?
Positive ones are the best kind: a new client is choosing who to book with. On a negative one the reply never picks the name up, because naming someone in a critical answer points them out publicly.
Try it on your own reviews
Connect your listing, let Asterias analyse your history, and judge it on what it proposes.
Start free trial